New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
psrp - use native copy mechanism #71409
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ansibot
added
affects_2.11
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
feature
This issue/PR relates to a feature request.
needs_triage
Needs a first human triage before being processed.
support:community
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible community.
support:core
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.
windows
Windows community
labels
Aug 22, 2020
The test
|
ansibot
added
needs_revision
This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR.
and removed
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
labels
Aug 22, 2020
ansibot
added
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
and removed
needs_revision
This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR.
labels
Aug 22, 2020
Works fine in my test. Any chance this will be back-ported to 2.9.x/2.10? |
Thanks for testing @egmar. I can try and backport the bits without the deprecation warning but it will be up to the release manager as to whether they would accept it for previous releases. |
jborean93
added a commit
to jborean93/ansible
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2020
* psrp - use native copy mechanism * Fix sanity issues * Split the bugfix and deprecation into separate changelog fragments (cherry picked from commit 985ba18)
jborean93
added a commit
to jborean93/ansible
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2020
* psrp - use native copy mechanism * Fix sanity issues * Split the bugfix and deprecation into separate changelog fragments (cherry picked from commit 985ba18)
This was referenced Aug 25, 2020
Very nice! I'm happy to see this as well. |
mkrizek
removed
the
needs_triage
Needs a first human triage before being processed.
label
Aug 25, 2020
nitzmahone
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2020
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
affects_2.11
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
feature
This issue/PR relates to a feature request.
support:community
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible community.
support:core
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.
windows
Windows community
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SUMMARY
Instead of creating a custom WinRS shell to provide the copy mechanisms this PR changes the process to the PSRP runspace itself. This is slightly slower than before due to the data being serialized in a PSRP fragment but it keeps the connection plugin purely PSRP.
Fixes: #59795
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
psrp